Why shopping centers have become places to connect
Shopping centers provide more than commercial activity: they offer accessible spaces where people can sit, meet others or simply experience the presence of people around them.
We go to shopping centres for more than the shops. They offer somewhere to meet, wander, sit or simply be among other people. What can these commercial spaces teach us about the places we need to feel connected?
Walk into a major Australian shopping centre shortly after it opens on a weekend and something curious is already happening.
People are there.
Some are walking the corridors. Others are drinking coffee, sitting on benches or meeting friends. Teenagers are finding one another. Parents have brought their children. Older people are watching the world go by.
Some will eventually leave carrying shopping bags. Others may buy very little.
We tend to assume people go to shopping centres for an obvious reason: to shop. But what if shopping is only part of the attraction?
What if one of the things shopping centres give us isn’t something we can buy at all – the simple experience of being around other people?
Our social ties are changing
Australians are certainly still socially connected. But some patterns of face-to-face interaction have changed.
The Australian Bureau of Statistics’ 2025 General Social Survey found that 53 per cent of Australians aged 15 and over had face-to-face contact with family or friends outside their household at least weekly. That was an improvement on 42 per cent in 2020, during the pandemic, but remained well below the 68 per cent recorded in 2019.
Participation in organised volunteering was also lower: 23 per cent in 2025 compared with 30 per cent in 2019.
These figures do not mean Australians have swapped family gatherings, community groups or volunteering for trips to the shops. The data cannot establish that.
But they do invite a broader question: where else are we getting the everyday experience of being around other people?
One answer may be hiding in plain sight.
Shopping centres keep attracting us
Physical shopping centres remain remarkably busy despite the convenience of online shopping.
Scentre Group, which operates Westfield destinations in Australia and New Zealand, reported 540 million customer visits in 2025, an increase of 2.7 per cent on the previous year.
Of course, visitation figures don’t tell us why people came. Most visitors probably had some combination of shopping, dining, entertainment or services in mind.
But contemporary shopping centres offer far more than shops. They contain cafés, restaurants, cinemas, gyms, health and beauty services, children’s activities and entertainment. They also provide places to walk, sit, meet and watch other people.
Perhaps we should therefore be careful about describing everyone who enters a shopping centre simply as a “shopper”.
A place simply to be
Researchers sometimes describe spaces outside home and work where people gather informally as ’third places’.
Traditionally, we might think of cafés, pubs, libraries, parks or community centres. Increasingly, researchers are asking whether shopping centres perform some of the same social functions.
A 2024 study of more than 100,000 people in Norway found almost 40 per cent visited shopping centres at least weekly. More importantly, substantial minorities identified social reasons for visiting: 29 per cent valued them as places to meet people they knew, 27 per cent as gathering places in their local community and 26 per cent as pleasant places to spend time with family and friends.
Norway is not Australia, so those percentages should not simply be transferred to Australian consumers. But the study points towards something easily overlooked when we think about shopping centres: their role as social infrastructure.
There is an even subtler form of social connection involved.
Imagine sitting alone with a coffee. You aren’t talking to anyone. Around you are conversations, footsteps, children, people meeting friends and strangers passing by.
You are alone. But you are also among people.
Recent qualitative research on shopping centres suggests people can value precisely this experience – being surrounded by others in a lively environment, even without directly interacting with them.
We might call this social co-presence.
Sometimes we don’t need a deep conversation or an organised social activity. We simply want to be somewhere where life is happening around us.
But this space isn’t neutral
Shopping centres make that remarkably easy.
There is generally no membership required, no appointment and no need to introduce yourself. They provide shelter from the weather, toilets, seating, food, entertainment, predictable opening hours – and, importantly, other people.
Someone can arrive alone, spend an hour among hundreds of people and leave without having to explain why they were there.
That is a remarkably low barrier to social participation.
But there is an important distinction between a shopping centre and a public park or library.
The shopping centre is privately owned commercial space. Its purpose ultimately includes generating economic activity.
The longer people stay, the more opportunities they have to encounter stores, brands, advertising, food outlets and other opportunities to consume.
There is nothing inherently wrong with that. A place can create commercial value while simultaneously providing a useful social environment.
But it raises a question worth considering: what happens when places designed for consumption also become places where we satisfy our desire simply to be around other people?
Public spaces could learn something
Rather than criticising shopping centres for performing this role, perhaps we should ask what they are getting right.
Australia already has libraries, parks, neighbourhood houses, community centres and other non-commercial places that provide important opportunities for connection.
But do we have enough places where people can simply arrive – without joining something, booking something, buying something or having a particular reason for being there?
For planners, councils and community organisations, shopping centres offer an interesting lesson. Comfortable seating, accessibility, safety, shelter, toilets, food, activities and the reliable presence of other people can make places attractive even when people have no specific transaction to complete.
None of this proves Australians are abandoning traditional community life for shopping centres. Nor does a crowded mall mean everyone there is seeking social connection.
But perhaps we have been asking too narrow a question about these spaces.
The next time you see a crowded shopping centre, don’t just ask:
“What have all these people come here to buy?”
Ask another question too:
“How many have come simply because this is where the other people are?”
This column first appeared on Pearls and Irritations and is republished by Global Catholic with permission.
Hope you loved reading this article. Global Catholic is powered by readers like you.
We have no corporate owner or funding agencies. Our in-depth commentaries, features and conversations are not behind the paywall.
We don’t carry advertisements as we want to offer a clutter-free reading experience.
To sustain and grow Global Catholic, we need to raise US$250,000.
Even as pope, Leo XIV submitted his vote-by-mail ballot for the US midterms, a gesture the Vatican presented as fidelity to the citizen’s duty of participation.
Venite ad Me is notable for what it omits, the role of universities and academic theology, revealing a mutual alienation between the Church and theology.
Debates over ancient evidence on women’s ordination miss the point: Jesus affirmed women’s full discipleship, and the real question is what the Church must create for this century, not past ones.
The ‘Vatican Note A Journey of Hope’ reaffirms Nostra Aetate’s call for authentic interreligious dialogue to build peace and resist political exploitation without diluting Catholic identity.
The Indian Church already depends enormously on women’s work, and the real task is not clericalizing them but moving from “help” to genuine co-responsibility, receiving their gifts more fully.
Why shopping centers have become places to connect
Google Search
Subscribe to Newsletter
We go to shopping centres for more than the shops. They offer somewhere to meet, wander, sit or simply be among other people. What can these commercial spaces teach us about the places we need to feel connected?
Walk into a major Australian shopping centre shortly after it opens on a weekend and something curious is already happening.
People are there.
Some are walking the corridors. Others are drinking coffee, sitting on benches or meeting friends. Teenagers are finding one another. Parents have brought their children. Older people are watching the world go by.
Some will eventually leave carrying shopping bags. Others may buy very little.
We tend to assume people go to shopping centres for an obvious reason: to shop. But what if shopping is only part of the attraction?
What if one of the things shopping centres give us isn’t something we can buy at all – the simple experience of being around other people?
Our social ties are changing
Australians are certainly still socially connected. But some patterns of face-to-face interaction have changed.
The Australian Bureau of Statistics’ 2025 General Social Survey found that 53 per cent of Australians aged 15 and over had face-to-face contact with family or friends outside their household at least weekly. That was an improvement on 42 per cent in 2020, during the pandemic, but remained well below the 68 per cent recorded in 2019.
Participation in organised volunteering was also lower: 23 per cent in 2025 compared with 30 per cent in 2019.
These figures do not mean Australians have swapped family gatherings, community groups or volunteering for trips to the shops. The data cannot establish that.
But they do invite a broader question: where else are we getting the everyday experience of being around other people?
One answer may be hiding in plain sight.
Shopping centres keep attracting us
Physical shopping centres remain remarkably busy despite the convenience of online shopping.
Scentre Group, which operates Westfield destinations in Australia and New Zealand, reported 540 million customer visits in 2025, an increase of 2.7 per cent on the previous year.
Of course, visitation figures don’t tell us why people came. Most visitors probably had some combination of shopping, dining, entertainment or services in mind.
But contemporary shopping centres offer far more than shops. They contain cafés, restaurants, cinemas, gyms, health and beauty services, children’s activities and entertainment. They also provide places to walk, sit, meet and watch other people.
Perhaps we should therefore be careful about describing everyone who enters a shopping centre simply as a “shopper”.
A place simply to be
Researchers sometimes describe spaces outside home and work where people gather informally as ’third places’.
Traditionally, we might think of cafés, pubs, libraries, parks or community centres. Increasingly, researchers are asking whether shopping centres perform some of the same social functions.
A 2024 study of more than 100,000 people in Norway found almost 40 per cent visited shopping centres at least weekly. More importantly, substantial minorities identified social reasons for visiting: 29 per cent valued them as places to meet people they knew, 27 per cent as gathering places in their local community and 26 per cent as pleasant places to spend time with family and friends.
Norway is not Australia, so those percentages should not simply be transferred to Australian consumers. But the study points towards something easily overlooked when we think about shopping centres: their role as social infrastructure.
There is an even subtler form of social connection involved.
Imagine sitting alone with a coffee. You aren’t talking to anyone. Around you are conversations, footsteps, children, people meeting friends and strangers passing by.
You are alone. But you are also among people.
Recent qualitative research on shopping centres suggests people can value precisely this experience – being surrounded by others in a lively environment, even without directly interacting with them.
We might call this social co-presence.
Sometimes we don’t need a deep conversation or an organised social activity. We simply want to be somewhere where life is happening around us.
But this space isn’t neutral
Shopping centres make that remarkably easy.
There is generally no membership required, no appointment and no need to introduce yourself. They provide shelter from the weather, toilets, seating, food, entertainment, predictable opening hours – and, importantly, other people.
Someone can arrive alone, spend an hour among hundreds of people and leave without having to explain why they were there.
That is a remarkably low barrier to social participation.
But there is an important distinction between a shopping centre and a public park or library.
The shopping centre is privately owned commercial space. Its purpose ultimately includes generating economic activity.
The longer people stay, the more opportunities they have to encounter stores, brands, advertising, food outlets and other opportunities to consume.
There is nothing inherently wrong with that. A place can create commercial value while simultaneously providing a useful social environment.
But it raises a question worth considering: what happens when places designed for consumption also become places where we satisfy our desire simply to be around other people?
Public spaces could learn something
Rather than criticising shopping centres for performing this role, perhaps we should ask what they are getting right.
Australia already has libraries, parks, neighbourhood houses, community centres and other non-commercial places that provide important opportunities for connection.
But do we have enough places where people can simply arrive – without joining something, booking something, buying something or having a particular reason for being there?
For planners, councils and community organisations, shopping centres offer an interesting lesson. Comfortable seating, accessibility, safety, shelter, toilets, food, activities and the reliable presence of other people can make places attractive even when people have no specific transaction to complete.
None of this proves Australians are abandoning traditional community life for shopping centres. Nor does a crowded mall mean everyone there is seeking social connection.
But perhaps we have been asking too narrow a question about these spaces.
The next time you see a crowded shopping centre, don’t just ask:
“What have all these people come here to buy?”
Ask another question too:
“How many have come simply because this is where the other people are?”
This column first appeared on Pearls and Irritations and is republished by Global Catholic with permission.
Hope you loved reading this article. Global Catholic is powered by readers like you.
We have no corporate owner or funding agencies. Our in-depth commentaries, features and conversations are not behind the paywall.
We don’t carry advertisements as we want to offer a clutter-free reading experience.
To sustain and grow Global Catholic, we need to raise US$250,000.
Join the remarkable Global Catholic journey
VATICAN DIARY
Pope Leo and the American Midterms
SIGNS OF THE TIMES
Venite ad Me: Catholic universities and the crisis of theologizing
WAYPOINTS
Pope Leo and the world’s great museums
GRIMMGRAM
First things first
LIGHTS AND SHADOWS
Nostra Aetate, a journey of hope: Embracing the challenge of otherness
MORALITY MATTERS
The Indian Church runs on women. How can it more fully receive their gifts?
Latest
Emmery’s Celtic Cross: the Irish forest artwork its creator never saw
A towel, not a throne: the Church Jesus envisioned
The sacraments are not symbols, but encounters with God
Thirty years on, why Cardinal Bernardin still matters
Meet the German Protestant sisters caring for leprosy outcasts in Pakistan
Oviedo Cathedral’s ban on Netflix’s ‘La Regenta’ revives a 150-year censorship saga
Trending
Venite ad Me: Catholic universities and the crisis of theologizing
‘What do you think sex is for?’
When Leo revisits Vatican Council’s rare superlative
Two popes, one heart: Magnifica Humanitas and the second year of Dilexit Nos
A doctorate and a vocation: What the Orientale gave Patriarch Bartholomew
Pope Leo’s call for transparency and evidence destruction
Pope Leo and the American Midterms
The conscious use of artificial intelligence
The home is the first sacrament of God’s presence
The Vatican’s faith diagnosis overlooks the mystical path