Sixty-four years have passed since John XXIII inaugurated the Second Vatican Council on Oct. 11, 1962.
The Council — which concluded in 1965 — remains the touchstone for the renewal and pastoral reforms that the Roman Church has yet to carry out, challenges that feel more urgent today than ever.
No pope since Roncalli (John XXIII’s birth name, Angelo Giuseppe Roncalli) has failed to claim fidelity to that Council’s legacy. Yet each has drawn on it selectively: some, holding closely to the letter of the conciliar documents, have closed doors that others have opened. This is understandable, in part.
National bishops’ conferences face enormously different social and religious realities worldwide, which makes it difficult to introduce changes that would reshape the Church’s historic face — a Church now led by Pope Leo XIV, elected in 2025.
Two unresolved questions illustrate this tension clearly: whether priests must be celibate, and whether women can hold the Church’s ordained offices.
The celibacy question: what Vatican II actually said
In the decree PresbyterorumOrdinis(Vatican II’s 1965 decree on the ministry and life of priests), the Council praised the value of celibacy but was explicit that it is not intrinsic to the priesthood.
This isn’t abstract: most Orthodox priests — informally called “popes,” from the Slavic term — are married, and so are most priests of the 23 Eastern Catholic Churches, which remain in full communion with Rome while keeping their own married clergy.
Sixty years ago, ordaining “viriprobati” — Latin for “proven men,” meaning mature, married candidates — within the Latin Church itself wasn’t even on the table.
Yet the two models have long coexisted peacefully in places like Transylvania: in Sibiu, northern Romania, a married Greek Catholic priest has led his parish in the city’s main square while, a few meters away, a celibate Latin-rite priest leads his own. Neither arrangement has scandalized local Catholics.
The debate resurfaced publicly in 2026.
Luc Terlinden, Archbishop of Mechelen-Brussels and president of Belgium’s bishops’ conference, argued in a July 2026 interview — after attending the Anglican General Synod in York — that the Latin Church as a whole, representing roughly 95% of the world’s 1.4 billion Catholics, could make room for viriprobati alongside celibate priests, serving side by side.
He noted the Belgian bishops had already raised the idea with Rome during the Synod on Synodality in 2023, but that nothing could change without papal approval.
Separately, Bishop Johan Bonny of Antwerp announced in a March 2026 pastoral letter his intention to ordain married men as priests by 2028 — his own initiative, which Terlinden himself noted cannot proceed without the pope’s consent.
As of now, no Italian bishop has publicly backed either Belgian proposal.
Women in ministry: the thornier, newer question
The more difficult issue — one Vatican II barely glimpsed — is whether women can be admitted to the Church’s “higher” ministries: deacon, priest, bishop.
The Council did include a notable, often-overlooked first step: 23 women were invited as official auditors, able to observe and consult, though not vote.
The Anglican Communion wrestled with a parallel question decades ago.
The Church of England’s General Synod voted to ordain women as priests on Nov. 11, 1992; the first 32 women were ordained at Bristol Cathedral on March 12, 1994, despite the departure of a number of clergy and laypeople who converted to Catholicism in protest.
Women bishops took longer: legislation failed in 2012 before finally passing in July 2014.
Libby Lane became the Church of England’s first woman bishop, consecrated in January 2015.
This year, that trajectory reached its highest point yet: Sarah Mullally was installed in March 2026 as the 106th Archbishop of Canterbury — the first woman to lead the Church of England in its history.
Catholic officials, meanwhile, remain more cautious.
In March 2026, the Vatican’s Synod General Secretariat published the final report of Study Group No. 5 — a body the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith led to study women’s roles in Church life and governance, formed after demands raised at the 2023 Synod on Synodality.
Its conclusion: there is not yet room, in the Vatican’s own assessment, for a positive magisterial decision opening the diaconate to women, though it proposed expanding non-ordained, “charismatic” forms of participation instead.
Cardinal Mario Grech, the Synod’s secretary general, has described the underlying resistance as largely cultural rather than doctrinal.
Opinions on what women’s ordination would actually accomplish remain split.
Some observers believe ordaining women priests would change little if the Roman Church’s structures remain male-dominated regardless of who fills which role. Others believe women’s full presence in ecclesiastical ministry would revitalize the entire Catholic community.
A seed still waiting to grow
Given where things stand, both ideas can sound like “fantasy theology” to skeptics.
Yet the question won’t go away: Were the seeds of these very possibilities already present in the event that began 64 years ago?
For now, Leo’s answer appears to lean toward “no.”
This is a translated and edited version of the column that first appeared on Religion Digital and has been republished with permission by Global Catholic.
















2 Comments
Eamonn Keane
October 15, 2026What a waste of time it is for Catholics to speculate about whether women will ever be ordained as priests when it is definitive Catholic doctrine that they cannot. Far better to encourage the laity to take seriously Vatican II’s teaching on the universal call to holiness, thereby strengthening their resolve to bring the Gospel into every dimension of their daily lives.
David Timbs
October 15, 2026“What a waste of time it is for Catholics to speculate about whether women will ever be ordained as priests when it is definitive Catholic doctrine that they cannot.”
Paul VI, JPII and Benedict XVI certainly taught that the Church did not have the authority to ordain women to the priesthood. The problem with the ‘definitive’ part is that there is no evidence that this teaching, just like the quasi-infallible ‘Humanae Vitae’ has been received by the Catholic Faithful and for very good theological and historical reasons.
Eventually the hierarchy will find the will and nerve to undertake a renewed examination of these the sources and arrive at conclusions quite different from Paul, JPII and Benedict, all of whom, I believe lost their nerve when the implications of historical theology dawned on them.